The Border "Crisis" & The Eradication Of Civil Liberty

Posted by Burtman on
Mar 22, 00:13.
March 22 2025, 12:13 am.

Updated:
Apr 23, 13:41.
April 23 2025, 01:41 pm.

Read Time: About 1 Minute

Bizarre And Unlawful


Over the past few years, since my eyes were rudely wrenched open by the plandemic scam, it's been pretty difficult to see anything that's going on in the world without almost immediately noticing the bullshit behind it. One recent and relevant example is the sudden, co-ordinated invasion of Europe by so-called "asylum seekers". So-called? Well, yes. The term "asylum seeker" clearly refers to those seeking safety from something, and war is the usual culprit. But in order to be fleeing war, there has to be one going on. And since there wasn't one in any of the places these military-aged men came from, the term simply didn't apply.

The narrative had so many holes in it, I couldn't bear to discuss it with people who thought there was legitimacy involved. After months of continuous invasion, the border police that stop me almost every time I go anywhere were nowhere to be seen. It was almost as if they'd been told not to interfere. Something stank like a skunk's backside, as usual.

I crossed a border or two, during this period, and at one point, was forced to stand in a two-hour long line, in order to enter my own country. As seemingly the only European in the entire place, border staff included, I watched, as at least fifty families without a passport between them, none of whom spoke a word of English, were waved through the border without a word. Then, my turn was up. As a passport-holding native, I was then asked a series of questions about my stay, including where I will go, with whom I expect to meet, and how long I intend to stay. It was like I'd entered the Twilight Zone, except I'd been in it for the last four years, by that point, and I'm still there, now.

Problem, Reaction, Solution...


The motive for this blatantly-organized invasion was clear to me, at that moment (not that it hadn't been obvious that people fleeing war don't leave their families behind and cross the rough ocean on a mattress, when they could just pop next door to a country not at war).

Citizen journalists all over Europe began flooding the internet with videos of foreign invaders burning their cities, cars, houses and businesses, chasing the natives with axes and machetes, and in some places, beheading innocent people in the street. In response, the usual flurry of MSM bullshit, propaganda and internet scrubbing began. The invasion of Europe could serve several purposes, but the most likely was to justify the introduction of the Digital ID system that millions of Europeans had already widely protested. The old Hegelian dialectic reared its syphilitic head, once again, and the justification for this "new idea" - a system they had already started building, in reality - began doing the rounds in the legacy media.

The long-planned "ETIAS" system - the Digital ID that forms the backbone of the Beast System, was being born, and the excuse for it was "to secure the borders, so we never have an invasion like this again". Except we will. The next time they want to infringe our rights.

By now, many of you are well aware of the deep state's age-old tactics for manipulating the masses and crushing our God-given freedoms, but for those who are new to the concept (you're a little late to the game, aren't ya?), it goes a little something like this:

Psychopaths with lots of money want to control everything on Earth (the old 'take over the world' chestnut), but they know that they can't start making the changes they want to, because it would get them all strung up from the street lights (here's hoping it'll still happen). So, they create a problem that their idea conveniently provides a "solution" for, and then they do some BS computer modeling, run a few talking heads blabbing on about how great it's going to be, and then roll it out.

The funny thing about these psychos is that their cult demands that they tell us everything they intend to do, in advance, so that when we don't react, they can say we consented and it's therefore our fault. But that's only the theory; in reality, of course, masking the intention in movies and cryptic articles in magazines doesn't constitute clear conveyance of a proposal, and someone not realizing what they're looking at doesn't constitute informed consent. But when people do recognize something, and go out in their millions to oppose it, then the media pretends it's not happening and the idea goes ahead, anyway.

And that's where we are with ETIAS. It's a system that aims to record all the biometric information of every single human, including babies, who enter or exit the EU, even if it's only as part of an onward journey, so that they can create a Digital ID for everyone, whether they like it (or even know about it) or not. They get away with it by lying and distracting us, and a good number of people are so used to listening to them, that they assume they can be trusted (because what self-elected, self-governed, legally immune, secretive, supranational corporate body can't be trusted?).

You could be forgiven for thinking that simply tracking entry and exit isn't much to worry about, but then, given the right propaganda, you could probably also be convinced that giving up gold in exchange for crypto could be a good idea (it's not - don't do it). Like 15-minute neighborhoods, ETIAS aims to expand. It starts as "only tracking certain people" and, of course, "for their safety". Once it's accepted, a new operation begins, creating a problem that can be solved by extending it to another demographic. Little by little, the frog boils to death. A few steps later, the system is tracking everyone, despite the fact that they already have passports and VISAs and all the rest of it, and using AI to make determinations about whether or not each of them can enter or exit (that's a bit like a prison, isn't it?).

When you look at how some supermarkets have started implementing cashless policies, and others have started using palm prints and facial recognition to take payments, it's not difficult to see where this one's headed. Soon enough, you won't be able to move from one city to another without having your fingerprints, blood and saliva taken. It's GATACA meets.... Forget it. It's China, today.

But Wait...


There are obviously some serious moral issues, here, but if you're about to travel and you want something a bit more concrete to argue for your freedom, try referring to the United Nations Universal Declaration Of Human Rights. Why? Well, these new border policies breach no less than three (3) of the declaration's clauses.

• If you consider being forced to submit bodily samples into a computer, in order to exercise your right to travel, this is degradation. Article 5 clearly states that No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

• If you don't consent to having your private and personal biometric information stored in a big brother system that will definitely end up for sale to tech companies, know that Article 12 states that No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

• And if you don't fancy letting some clown in a suit put his corporate policy in the way of your right (not privilege) to travel, it's worth noting that Article 13 states that (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.
and (2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.
.

Interference with your rights is unlawful. The preamble of this document clearly states that (among other things) ...recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world...

It would, therefore, be unlawful to place any form of hindrance against these rights, such as making them conditional on your compliance with new big brother bullshit. Your right to travel exists, and supersedes all laws and legislation in the world. You can simply say "No".

Did You Vote For This?

You Will Need To Pay To Enter The UK From April 2025 - Expats.cz

You Now Need A Permit To Travel From Czechia To The UK - Expats.cz

As an aside, all governments are private corporations, and without a contract, nothing they say can lawfully apply to you. So why do we put up with their constant encroaching? That's a good question, and one I'd love to know the answer to. If we went back to the Wild West mentality, we could blow them out of their boots by lunch time and be a free species, for the first time in ... probably ever.


Stay Up To Date

Stay In The Loop About Articles & Other Content
More From Burtman
Notifies you about Burtman's projects outside of van-life. Emails are sent on Wednesday afternoons, if there is content to share. Sign In To Join

Sign In To Leave A Comment

There are no comments marked as public for this item.

Sign up or sign in to read all comments and write your own.
Back To The Top